" Beyond luring deceptive logo's there IS a peopleverse "

Ah yes, I see how that may seem confusing.

I think delightful.club is a worthwhile effort, hence the time and energy I spent on it. Time and again I have tried and also found people willing to co-maintain… none of these led to active co-maintainership, and the lists getting more outdated unless I step up.

The conclusion then is it is unsustainable and not worthwhile putting energy in. Doing so would only keep the project artificially alive. The commons not stepping up is the signal to stop. I can and do maintain personal curated lists.

No implication at all. The commons de-facto chooses what it values, and sees no use. It is Nature, it is organic… it is as it is.

Btw, the same is true for SocialHub. I made multiple calls for people to step up. Some did, luckily, but too few to do anything really. AFAIK @how is still the only person whom SocialHub members decide should do most the chores on this forum. I saw @naturzukunft request for a tag to be added. But whom was that asked to? Well, implicitly Hellekin, but it was formulated as an appeal to a non-existing community.