Do we need a Process for our DoOcracy?
Yesterday I suggested that the SWICG might need a process to close open issues in AS/AP W3C repositories on Github. Related to that…
Do we need a process to follow up on topics discussed in this forum? An action repository under https://codeberg.org/fediverse where issues are tracked, assigned and dealt with.
This forum is full of people suggesting actions, making proposals. Who’s following up on that? To whom are the proposal made? Well, to whom the glove fits in true DoOcracy fashion. But these action points are spread all over the place.
One example: In FEP-1570: The FEP Ontology Process @melvincarvalho makes several proposals:
These are candidates for having issues tracking them.