I know in the Fediverse we often use “Webfinger ID” to refer to the user@domain
form, but strictly the spec is about looking up metadata for any URI that can be bound to a domain, so I don’t think its good terminology here.
–
I think several people (including myself) have at different times suggested using xrd:Alias
for this - as I suggested then, and still suggest now:
{
"@context": [
"https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
{
"xrd": "http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/xri/xrd-1.0#",
"aliases": {
"@id": "xrd:Alias",
"@type": "@id",
"@container": "@list"
},
}
],
"id": "https://social.example.com/user/bob",
"aliases": ["acct:bob@example.com"]
}
(this continues the long tradition of RDF syntaxes stealing directly from their XML cousins)
and the producing implementation would sort aliases in order of preference - so, basically, if you’re looking for the user@domain form of a user, you look for the first acct:
URI in user
There are some nice advantages to this:
- It diectly equates the WebFinger XRD/JRD values with the value in the AS2 representation
- It indicates that its directly semantically equivalent to a property already used as part of these lookups anyway
- It prepares us for any future extensions - as other people have proposed, DID based schemes and similar (we might hit the semantic confusion issue caused by DID ill-advisedly reusing as:alsoKnownAs here; but that’s a problem for another time…)
Defining a dedicated “webfinger” field for this purpose seems strictly less capable.