FEP Process - Clarity on positioning: open and inclusive

[aschrijver]

@hrefna

The basic “may work well enough” version is to simply have a Code of Conduct and a set of requirements and let volunteers enforce those requirements. This does not solve the malfeasance concerns that people have (and, as with worldcon, those are significant) but it does mean (as with worldcon) that it “works well enough in the average case.”

Creating Codeberg: Code of Conduct … check as something to definitely be more clear about.

As for other requirements and malfeasance. Not particular creative this morning in thinking about this, but suppose a FEP by a government agency, say NSA, that constitutes backdooring apps to expose PII or recommending weakened security protocols / encryption. Guess that might be covered by the CoC, depending how it is formulated, but likely do not match the out-of-the-box templates. What are other requirements to take into account?