POLL: SocialHub Scope and Purpose?

[hamishcampbell]

@helge

I agree with you that there is a need to define structures to address “governance” such as moderation issues. For example, it would be useful to have a way to fight the idea that “blocking stuff” is a silver bullet.

The current lack of grounded thinking about BLOCKING and control is such an ant-social process, when we start to think about groups and trust this can take us back to the more “native” openweb path.

@helge

However, I don’t think this can be the place. There are already more discussions happening here than I can process.

This is exactly the place we need to talk about wider issues, the fep process is a current example, people come in with #geekproblem issues and push these though very small #geekproblem process to arrive at #geekproblem outcomes this is fine if you think we don’t currently have a problem

http://hamishcampbell.com/2023/02/18/the-solution-to-the-geekproblem-is-to-realize-that-good-societies-are-built-on-trust-not-control/

The fix for this is not obvuse, but narrowing this “governance” place to ONLY the #geekproblem is clearly not going to work

@helge

I also think that the technical and social problems of the FediVerse currently don’t have a lot of overlap.

So let’s add some social thinking where it’s needed and make some effect to explane complex tec issues in a way more normal people can have input into the outcome, it’s all very basic simple stuff that we should be doing anyway.