The most important point about that is that you can prove using only
constants of social interaction that this structure can be scaled to
arbitrary size:
This gives an upper bound for propagating blocks and content discovery
at (on average) polling 15-30 users per minute â a value that should still
hold true at a user count in the billions.
Thanks very much @ArneBab. This is going to be fun and probably a lot of work but honestly Iâve been thinking about web of trust + social media for a couple years and probably have some biases to shed along the way.
I probably mentioned this before. Send Block activities to your followers and/or to the public inbox instead of or in addition to your site admin. The code on the receiver end could render these into a form with âacceptâ, ârejectâ, âask meâ, âblock sender insteadâ, and âremember this decisionâ (e.g. automatically deal with future block activities from this actor in the same manner). Then youâve got a scalable federated web of trust (at least to the limit of your available storage resources; which is a problem inherent with any solution based on blocking). The site adminâs interface works exactly the same but they might also follow some automatons which send Block activities that react to network-wide events. And this is all supported by the current ActivityPub specification.