Should we fork AS/AP specs to Codeberg, create vNext drafts?

[helge]

Evidence why I think ActivityStreams Core needs a rewrite:

HTTP signature claimed to be invalid

Yes, that really works. Thanks for helping out… (Actually, I somehow suspected that, but as all related chapters in Matodon’s documentation claims it supports JSON-LD, I was mislead to believe that… Hooray for claiming to implement standards and then not doing!) So, now I just need to do that in a nice (not special-cased) way in my JSON-LD serializer.

If ActivityStreams Core simply stated: “All objects are Json-LD 1.1.” the entire confusion (including mine) could have been avoided.

Bonus content: Also note how messed up HTTP Signatures currently are! They depend on a correct interpretation of ActivityStreams Core.