Toward ActivityPub 2.0

[helge]

Unfortunately yes. I’ve stated several times that I would prefer them to be clearly stated to be json-ld, see e.g.

Should we fork AS/AP specs to Codeberg, create vNext drafts?

If someone starts working on upgraded specification documents Activity Streams Core definitely needs to be revisited first or discarded. I would expect this to be the place, where the requirements on an ActivityStreams object are clearly stated. So it should be something like: ActivityStreams Objects must be Json-ld ActivityStreams Objects must have a type ActivityStreams Objects with id are called transitive (is this a good name? I think it’s the one the documents use). transitive ActivitySt…