Since Zuck’s recent comments justifying the removal of fact-checkers by their “political bias” and the need to defend “free speech”, a new wave of exodus started from Mata products. As soon as Project92, AKA Threads dot net was announced, a bunch of “Masto zealots” – to knick John Gruber’s term – proposed the fedipact, one and a half year before the Zuckerberg outbreak.
The Fedi Pact pledge:
“i am an instance admin/mod on the fediverse. by signing this pact, i hereby agree to block any instances owned by meta should they pop up on the fediverse. project92 is a real and serious threat to the health and longevity of fedi and must be fought back against at every possible opportunity”
hiiiiiiiiiiii welcome to the NEW official account for The Anti-Meta Fedi Pact at https://fedipact.online/
The Pact was started on june 17th, 2023 by @vantablack as a way to defend against meta’s intended incursion into the fediverse
it’s basically a (very pretty) list of instances who’ve signed it and agreed to block project92/barcelona/threads whenever it appears
to read about vanta’s personal reasons for creating The Pact you can visit 🖤 Why? 🖤
Although already mentioned in https://socialhub.activitypub.rocks/t/how-to-deal-with-highly-controversial-fep-submissions/3876/5, I thought this should deserve its own topic.