CW: E3 / defense against sabotage.
—
What about a license that requires any/all
- … [footnote 1]
to only operate provided all the following conditions are met:
- Affero GPL; and
- Rust-style license (or similar)
which
ensures consistency & interoperability with a “base spec” [1, again],
and
does neither {modify, extend, customize, operate, **express intent nor condition(s) nor possibility(ies) nor option(s) to (operate nor behave nor customize) ** … etc legalese}
in any way(s), shape nor form which could possibly/potentially hinder the future ability of {BASE SPEC} and {“YOUR” implementation or spec} to have full total current and any/all possible FUTURE interoperability.
…
###Downside:###
Inhibits possible innovation.
Q:
Is there a way to do this in a way which would NOT prevent innovation?
Maybe a consensus among all?
Trial & prototype periods of 18months per new feature;
no more than 1 new feature at a time per the whole FEP?
(lol)
I have no idea.
[1]
“including but not limited to:
- apps
- clients
- servers
- software
- hardware
- policies
- license agreements
- features
- protocols
- implementations
- instances
- etc
”
I apologize as
i. I’m new at this; and
ii. I’m new at this.