My understanding of the Fediversity category, based on the discussions that led to its creation, is that it’s a discussion space for people working on references sites about the fediverse (guides and manuals, news, instance mapping, software research etc). The idea was to create opportunities for cross-project coordination, in a similar way to what other categories provide for implementers working on fediverse software and protocols.
EDIT: See the pinned topic by the original category host @tao.
A new topic was recently added to Fediversity called Multi-agent Systems and ActivityPub, which is about quite technical protocol-level stuff relevant to implementers. I suggested moving it to the ActivityPub category, but @how replied;
This suggests a very different understanding of what the Fediversity category is for. Perhaps based on ways it has been used during my absence (late 2020-late 2022), rather than the initial vision?
If Fediversity has an established and useful purpose other than what I laid out above, then perhaps we need a new category for the original purpose. Alternatively, perhaps topics about software that aren’t developed enough for the ActivityPub category could go into the top-level Software category. I’m happy to proceed either way, what do @how and others think?