Please reply below to propose an agenda item. Please consider doing some ahead-of-time work to articulate the item, and linking it in your proposal so others can come prepared to build consensus or raise objections that we can discuss in our limited time together.
I’d like to discuss ActivityPub collections and my FEP, again.
Whether I should move forward with the Accept{…} activity as an acknowledgement for something being added to a publicly-appendable collection.
We need to think of a way to query a remote collection to determine whether it contains an item without downloading the whole thing. This could be useful in a number of different ways — like getting an authoritative response on whether a wall post was accepted, or whether someone is someone else’s friend.
That is so boring that I would like to talk about “Link Relations” and if we find the time a quick continuation about open points in “Capability Negotiation”
PROPOSAL: @codenamedmitri - 5min - Summarize previous meetings’ conversation about SocialCG Issue Trackers. (Short version: There is no one issue tracker, but several. And there’s the FEP process.)
@grishka I also have that issue. I currently testing to provide a SPARQL Endpoint to a actors store.
I’m 99,9% sure, that our AP Implementation will provide SPARQL.
My solution uses rdf4j.
